2019 has been a frustrating season for the Chicago Cubs organization and fans. A complete inability to win on the road, coupled with mounting injuries to key personnel, and under-performing players have left many scratching their heads and searching for someone to blame.
Much of this blame has been directed at ownership (for not allowing more spending), management (for not signing the right players or signing the wrong ones), or at Joe Maddon (for not doing a better job of handling and motivating the roster). While some of these criticisms are well-earned, its not such a simple blame game. In reality, there is a much larger, underlying problem that is not the fault of any of the aforementioned persons, but is more just an unfortunate byproduct of past decisions.
There are two main issues that work hand-in-hand with one another, and they date back to the rebuild.
During the rebuild, the Cubs put a prime focus on acquiring young bats to populate the farm system. Through the draft, trades, and IFA signings, they were able to acquire some tier 1 talent. However, while these players were considered high potential, many of them were of similar archetypes (big time power coupled with high strikeouts). Fast forward to 2019, the Cubs lineup can mash, but they struggle to get on base consistently and have trouble getting hits when they need them. This approach wasn't a bad idea, especially since some of the prospects developing during this time were thought to eventually develop above average hit tools.
But unfortunately, that's not really how it all panned out.
Prospects like Kyle Schwarber and Ian Happ still developed into solid players, but their hit tools never quite came around as expected. Coupled with someone like Albert Almora (who has never quite developed into the hitter that people had hoped), the Cubs have been left with a desperate need for more contact driven hitters (especially near the top of the order).
This hitter-heavy approach also had a secondary drawback to it:
Lack of an adequate in-house developed pitching pipeline.
From 2012-2017, here is the full list of the names inside the Cubs top 10 prospects that were pitchers:
Arodys Vizcaino (traded to Atl for Tommy La Stella)
Trey McNutt (never appeared in Majors)
Pierce Johnson (out of baseball)
Carl Edwards Jr. (traded to SD for Brad Wieck)
Duane Underwood (currently in AAA Iowa)
Dylan Cease (traded to CHW for Jose Quintana)
Oscar De La Cruz (currently in AA Tennessee)
Trevor Clifton (currently in AAA Iowa)
Jose Albertos (currently in A South Bend, forgotten how to throw strikes)
Adbert Alzolay (currently in AAA Iowa)
Alex Lange (traded to Det fro Nicholas Castellanos)
Brendon Little (currently in A+ Myrtle Beach)
Thomas Hatch (traded to Tor for David Phelps)
Justin Steele (currently in AA Tennessee)
This list not only highlights the lack of pitching depth the Cubs farm system had during this time period, but also the lack of quality arms. Such a void in this department forced the Cubs to seek external solutions to their pitching problems since 2016. This has also led to some of the financial constraints as well as the organization signed players like Tyler Chatwood and Brandon Morrow to try and plug holes in the roster.
Now all of that being said, the Cubs have since addressed their pitching deficiencies on the farm, and that is something that could pay dividends in the coming seasons. There is still a lack of good contact hitters in the system, but there is some promise currently developing. Though, these both should continue to be addressed in the near future.
In reality, the Cubs struggles in 2019 (and 2018 really) are just a byproduct of the rebuild and winning the title in 2016. Certain areas may not have been focused on as much as they should have been, and other areas were made weaker by aggressive trades (see Aroldis Chapman and Jose Quintana deals; note: I am not re-litigating either of those trades. I actually still approve of both of them, but their effects can be felt).
So what should the Cubs do this offseason? Well I don't think any drastic changes are in order. The roster doesn't need to be blown up and we don't need 15 new faces showing up to Wrigley next season. But I do believe the Cubs need a slight change of course with their roster approach.
Currently, the roster is nothing more than the sum of its parts (actually even less so in some instances). The biggest problem facing the current 40-man roster is too much redundancy. For example, Ian Happ and Kyle Schwarber have very similar hitting profiles as big time power bats with lots of Ks and BBs. By themselves, that's not a bad approach in this day and age. But combined with a rest of a lineup that is almost identical to that? Now that's a problem.
The same goes for the bullpen and rotation: plenty of guys who can get outs and perform admirably, but not a whole lot of power arms/guys with swing and miss stuff. Hence some (but not all) of the pitching woes and inconsistency observed during the last two seasons.
This offseason, the Cubs should find a way to reduce the redundancy on their roster by trading away duplicitous players for controllable pieces who fill specific roles (like top of the order, contact driven hitters with a little bit of pop). There are definitely deals that could be made with different teams who have what the Cubs need, and themselves want what the Cubs are selling. I plan on doing a much bigger piece on the offseason as a whole when it comes time, so I won't get into many specifics right now.
In the meantime, there's still plenty of baseball left to be played. I firmly believe the Cubs have enough talent on paper to make a playoff run, but the team this season hasn't been performing like it. We shall see how things pan out in the coming weeks.
Tuesday, August 27, 2019
Why the Cubs struggles this season can be traced back to the rebuild, and why they should approach this offseason with controlled abandon
Saturday, August 10, 2019
Why Yu Darvish is actually having a dominant season
Yu Darvish’s first season in Cubbie blue certainly didn’t go to plan. After signing a 6-year $126M contract during the 2017-2018 offseason, Darvish stumbled out of the gate in 2018 (8 starts with a 4.95 ERA) before landing in the IL with an elbow issue. When he finally looked like he may get back to Wrigley, Darvish left one of his rehab starts with pain and was subsequently shut down for the rest of the season.
Many fans wanted to jump ship on Darvish following an extremely disappointing first season. That list only grew through his first 8 starts of 2019 (5.40 ERA 1 QS 8.10 BB/9). Others, like myself, urged fans to stay the course. Darvish had a long history of success in Texas (a ballpark notoriously hard to pitch in) and some things just didn’t seem right. His walk rate and fastball command were not what they once were. Had he diminished as a pitcher? Was he still injured? Was he not locked in mentally?
Or maybe...
Was he just a bit rusty?
Coming off 186 innings and a WS run in 2017, Darvish only tossed 40 (injury-riddled) major league innings in 2018. For a guy who hadn’t thrown healthy major league innings since October 2017, it honestly isn’t surprising he struggled to find a rhythm early in 2019. Think that’s just an excuse? Check out what happened on May 15th:
In his 9th start of the season, Darvish went into Great American Ballpark (another hitter friendly park) and fanned 11 Reds in 5.1 IP. Best part:
He walked no one
In fact, he hasn’t really walked anyone since then. Since that May 15th start, Darvish’s walk rate is only 1.70 BB/9 (plummeting his season to only 3.48) while still maintaining a filthy 10.76 K/9. He has also started to work deeper into games (6+ IP in 12/16 starts, 6 QS) and is starting to look more like the pitcher everyone expected when he signed that large contract just a season and a half ago.
While it might be tempting to look at his 4.06 ERA since that start against the Reds (and his 4.43 season ERA) and not be impressed, there’s one major consideration that needs to be taken:
His insane HR/9 rate.
At 1.77 this season, Darvish’s rate is way above both league average and his career average. So what is causing this?
Well the simple answers would typically point to augmented fly ball or hard contact rates. But therein lies the rub with Darvish:
Both his fly ball rate (33.4%) and hard contact rate (29.6%) are below his career averages. In fact, he’s inducing more ground balls than ever before in his career (47.0%).
Now with that being said, I will mention that when batters are hitting fly balls against Darvish, his hard contact rate is at a career high (39.6%). Welcome to baseball in 2019.
Nonetheless, Darvish’s abnormally high HR/FB rate (23.4%, which is insane even for 2019) seems to indicate bad luck more than anything. To understand how well he’s actually been pitching, just take a look at his SIERA (an indicator of what a pitchers true ERA should be. For a good explanation see here) Since that start against the Reds, Darvish sits at a strong 3.37: indicating he’s firing on all cylinders.
While results on the field are often all that matters, I do firmly believe that there is a lot to love about Yu Darvish’s season. He seems to be finding his groove in Cubbie blue in 2019, especially of late. If he can keep it up, he will certainly be a major asset come October.
Tuesday, August 6, 2019
Midseason Cubs Top Prospects List (My First Ever)
Now what is the current state of the Cubs farm? Well despite appearances of futility (ranked 28th on Bleacher Report), I firmly believe the Cubs system is criminally underrated. The system is clearly different from the powerhouse that had been created during the rebuild; and yes, it is still lacking in upper echelon talent. But the pieces are all there right now and the Cubs should find their farm on the rise in the coming years.
Before getting into the individual rankings, here is just quick overview of the strengths/weakness of the current system:
Strengths
- Right-handed pitching
- Middle infielders
- Catchers
- Power Arms
- Advanced talent
- Power Bats
- Left-handed pitching
And now for the list. Enjoy!
1) Nico Hoerner Pos: SS Acq: 2018 Draft (1st) Age: 22 Level: AA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 12.8% K rate
- Best tool: Hit (60)
2) Miguel Amaya Pos: C Acq: 2015 IFA (1.3M) Age: 20 Level: A+ ETA: 2022
- Key stat: 11.8% BB rate
- Best tool: Field (60)
3) Brailyn Marquez Pos: LHP Acq: 2015 IFA (600K) Age: 20 Level: A+ ETA: 2022
- Key stat: 11.86 K/9 in South Bend
- Best tool: Fastball (65)
If you were living under a rock on July 25th, its possible you may have missed what Brailyn Marquez did that day: 6IP 1H 14K on 71 pitches (53 strikes). Yes... you read that stat line correctly. Oh, and it gets better: he touched 100 mph on the gun in South Bend. And then he backed it up with 6 no hit innings (8K) in his next start. Those outings earned him a promotion from South Bend to Myrtle Beach and are just a taste of the upside that the flame-throwing lefty out of the Dominican Republic possesses. Brailyn has a high end fastball that frankly, I may be underrating. He backs it up with a power curve that has shown flashes of being a plus secondary. His change-up is still a work in progress, but at age 20 he still has time to develop it. The Cubs will handle him with care as he works to develop a strong third offering and to throw more consistent strikes (5.30 BB/9). Regardless, Marquez has produced strong results in his first taste of full season ball, due in large part to a 49.4% GB rate. If that continues and he is able to cut down on the walks, Marquez is likely to achieve his ace-like potential.
4) Brennen Davis Pos: CF Acq: 2018 Draft (2nd) Age: 19 Level: A ETA: 2022
- Key stat: wRC+ 145
- Best tool: Speed (65)
Side note: Please for the love of God stop hitting him in the hand with pitches
5) Adbert Alzolay Pos: RHP Acq: 2012 IFA (10K) Age: 24 Level: AAA ETA: 2019
- Key stat: 2995 rpm curveball spin rate
- Best tool: Curveball (60)
6) Cole Roederer Pos: CF Acq: 2018 Draft (2nd) Age: 19 Level: A ETA: 2022
- Key stat: 10 SBs
- Best tool: Hit (55)
Roederer absolutely feasted on rookie-ball pitching in his pro debut (.275/.354/.465) and impressed scouts and the Cubs very early on. The Cubs were so impressed that they opted to push him straight to full season ball in South Bend. However, he showed his age early on in the season as he ran into some trouble putting the ball in play and making solid contact. He has since rebounded (he hit for the cycle on June 25th) and is again showing all the tools that the scouts fell in love with. Roederer has very solid plate discipline and a smooth left-handed swing, so his current strikeout rates should improve with experience. Roederer's most underrated skill is his sneaky speed which plays up on the basepaths due to plus instincts. His offensive profile should fit nicely near the top of the order. He is an average defender in CF with decent instincts, but his lack of arm strength makes him more likely to profile as an every day LF long term.
7) Christopher Morel Pos: 3B Acq: 2015 IFA (800K) Age: 20 Level: A ETA: 2022
- Key stat: .183 ISO
- Best tool: Power (55)
8) Kohl Franklin Pos: RHP Acq: 2018 Draft (6th) Age: 19 Level: A- ETA: 2023
- Key stat: 1.52 ERA
- Best tool: Change-up (60)
9) Ryan Jensen Pos: RHP Acq: 2019 Draft (1st) Age: 21 Level: A- ETA: 2022
- Key stat: Fastball (70)
- Best tool: 6.2 IP per start at Fresno State in 2019
10) Tyson Miller Pos: RHP Acq: 2016 (4th) Age: 23 Level: AAA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 1.84 BB/9 in AA
- Best tool: Slider (55)
11) Zack Short Pos: SS Acq: 2016 Draft (17th) Age: 24 Level: AAA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: .193 ISO
- Best tool: Field (60)
12) Chase Strumpf Pos: 2B Acq: 2019 Draft (2nd) Age: 21 Level: A- ETA: 2021
- Key stat: .954 OPS
- Best tool: Hit (55)
13) Cory Abbott Pos: RHP Acq: 2017 Draft (2nd) Age: 23 Level: AA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 5.72 BB/9 in July
- Best tool: Cutter (60)
14) Richard Gallardo Pos: RHP Acq: 2018 IFA (1M) Age: 17 Level: Rk ETA: 2024
- Key stat: 20.1% SwStr
- Best tool: Curveball (60)
15) Riley Thompson Pos: RHP Acq: 2018 Draft (11th) Age: 21 Level: A ETA: 2021
- Key stat: < 2 ER in 13/16 starts
- Best tool: Fastball (70)
16) Aramis Ademan Pos: SS Acq: 2015 IFA (2M) Age: 20 Level: A+ ETA: 2021
- Key stat: wRC+ 101
- Best tool: Field (55)
17) Ethan Hearn Pos: C Acq: 2019 Draft (6th) Age: 18 Level: Rk ETA: 2024
- Key stat: 46.2% SwStr
- Best tool: Arm (55)
18) Justin Steele Pos: LHP Acq: 2014 Draft (5th) Age: 24 Level: AA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: .404 BABIP
- Best tool: Fastball (60)
19) Nelson Velazquez Pos: RF Acq: 2017 Draft (5th) Age: 20 Level: A ETA: 2023
- Key stat: .293 avg.
- Best tool: Arm (60)
20) Brendon Little Pos: LHP Acq: 2017 Draft (1st) Age: 22 Level: A ETA: 2022
- Key stat: .169 BAA
- Best tool: Fastball (55)
21) Yovanny Cruz Pos: RHP Acq: 2016 IFA (60K) Age: 19 Level: Rk ETA: 2023
- Key stat: 37.1% SwStr in 2018
- Best tool: Fastball (60)
22) Jeremiah Estrada Pos: RHP Acq: 2017 Draft (6th) Age: 20 Level: A- ETA: 2023
- Key stat: 12.66 K/9
- Best tool: Change-up (60)
23) Jack Patterson Pos: LHP Acq: 2018 Draft (32nd) Age: 23 Level: AA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 1.62 ERA
- Best tool: Sinker (55)
24) Erich Uelmen Pos: RHP Acq: 2017 Draft (4th) Age: 23 Level: A+ ETA: 2021
- Key stat: 61.6% GB Rate
- Best tool: Sinker (60)
25) Pedro Martinez Pos: SS Acq: 2018 IFA (300K) Age: 18 Level: A- ETA: 2024
- Key stat: .935 OPS in AZL
- Best tool: Hit (55)
26) Fabian Pertuz Pos: SS/3B Acq: 2017 IFA (300K) Age: 18 Level: Rk ETA: 2024
- Key stat: wRC+ 112
- Best tool: Speed (60)
27) Reivaj Garcia Pos: 2B Acq: 2017 IFA (500K) Age: 17 Level: Rk ETA: 2024
- Key stat: wRC+ 110 in 2018
- Best tool: Hit (55)
28) Wyatt Short Pos: LHP Acq: 2016 Draft (13th) Age: 24 Level: AA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 9.89 K/9
- Best tool: Slider (55)
29) Keegan Thompson Pos: RHP Acq: 2017 Draft (3rd) Age: 24 Level: AA ETA: 2021
- Key stat: 8K in 5IP in 2019
- Best tool: Curveball (55)
30) Oscar De La Cruz Pos: RHP Acq: 2012 IFA (85K) Age: 24 Level: AA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 31.8% bullpen K rate
- Best tool: Fastball (55)
31) Fernando Kelli Pos: CF Acq: 2016 IFA Age: 20 Level: A- ETA: 2024
- Key stat: wRC+ 118
- Best tool: Speed (70)
32) Andy Weber Pos: SS Acq: 2018 Draft (5th) Age: 21 Level: A ETA: 2022
- Key stat: .824 OPS vs. lefties
- Best tool: Arm (60)
33) Dakota Mekkes Pos: RHP Acq: 2016 Draft (10th) Age: 24 Level: AAA ETA: 2020
- Key stat: 2.81 pre-break ERA
- Best tool: Fastball (65)
34) Yonathan Perlaza Pos: 3B Acq: 2015 IFA (1.3M) Age: 20 Level: A ETA: 2024
- Key stat: .141 ISO in Eugene
- Best tool: Speed (55)
35) Jose Albertos Pos: RHP Acq: 2015 IFA (1.5M) Age: 20 Level: A ETA: 2024
- Key stat: 8.16 BB/9
- Best tool: Change-up (55)
My, how the mighty have fallen. A consensus top 5 prospect to open last season, Jose Albertos hasn't been able to get out of his own way the last two seasons as he just can't find the strikezone (19.3 BB/9 in 2018). I am not ready to give up yet, however. Albertos was widely regarded as a top prospect because of his pure "stuff", highlighted by a plus-plus fastball and a change-up that flashed as plus-plus. He is still only 20 so there is time to figure it out and achieve his immensely high ceiling, but he has to figure out the mental aspect of the game first.
Top prospects breakdown by position (top 20)
RHP: 14 (7)
LHP: 5 (3)
C: 2 (2)
IF: 10 (5)
OF: 4 (3)
Top prospects breakdown by level (top 20)
AAA: 4 (3)
AA: 7 (3)
A+: 4 (3)
A: 9 (6)
A-: 6 (3)
Rk: 5 (2)
Probable top prospects, but haven't seen enough yet to judge
- Ronnier Quintero (2019 IFA)
- Jose Lopez (DSL)
- Rafael Morel (DSL)
- Yohendrick Pinango (DSL)
- Michael McAvene (3IP in Eugene)
Just missed the cut
- Jonathan Sierra OF (20, A)
- Zac Taylor OF (23, A)
- Jeffrey Passantino RHP (23, A+)
- Javier Assad RHP (22, A+)
- Luis Verdugo SS (18, Rk)
- DJ Artis OF (22, A+)
25 and older players to watch
- Rowan Wick RHP (26, MLB)
- Robel Garcia 2B (26, AAA)
- Duane Underwood RHP (25, MLB)
- Dillon Maples RHP (27, AAA)
- Philip Evans 3B (26, AAA)
- James Norwood RHP (25, AAA)
- Trent Giambrone 2B (25, AAA)
About Me (And My New Blog)
My name is Anthony and I was born and raised in the greatest city in the world: Chicago, where we have the best food (especially pizza), best people (seriously, Midwest people are awesome), and the best sports teams and fans (over 5 million people showed up to the Cubs 2016 championship parade, how many showed up to YOUR team's last championship parade?).
Of course I'm not biased at all....
Despite my clearly unbiased opinions on the city of Chicago, there is another Midwest city that is near and dear to my heart: Omaha.
I spent four of the best years on my life at Creighton University (coincidentally at the same exact time as Doug McDermott was lighting the NCAA basketball world on fire). For those of you who have never been to Omaha, you're seriously missing out and I strongly encourage you to make a visit (go during the College World Series, the entire city is electric).
After getting a Bachelor's in Biology, I went on to pursue a PhD in Biology at the University of Delaware. Six long years later, and I finally (mercifully) achieved that goal. Now I am working on my dream to become a physician at Nova Southeastern Allopathic.
As you can probably tell, I am a big sports fan and I love talking shop. Much of my blog will talk about my favorite teams (Cubs, Bears, Bulls, and Creighton basketball), but I will also sprinkle in some discussions about the MLB, NFL, NBA, NCAAF, and NCAAB, and maybe a little fantasy advice here and there.
Some people may say I'm a bit outspoken....... I'm not gonna say that they're wrong. I like to give my opinions on things and I hope that you, the reader, will enjoy what I write on this blog.
If you're interested in following me on social media, I will post links every time I make a new blog post. My Twitter handle is: @ViatorLion10
I also have a Facebook page with a couple of friends that I am trying to get going again. We post videos amongst other things on that page, so feel free to give that a follow as well: